Return to the HH-60G Division Page
We are looking for some assistance scripting adversary ground order of battle for the Combat Rescue (CR) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) being conducted by HQ ACC and the Air Warfare Center. The CR AoA mission is to provide warfighter with one or more robust upgrade or replacement options for the existing HH-60G recovery vehicle. Your assistance is needed in answering the questions below or providing us with leads to finding this information.
We need this information as soon as practical to support a number of upcoming meetings starting 11 April. You may contact Mr Steve Lupenski at DSN 682-5095 stephen.lupenski@nellis.af.mil or Mr Mike Agin at DSN 682-7422 michael.agin@nellis.af.mil. If your response is classified you can email us at 422tes.doh@nellis.af.smil.mil.
How would/did our adversaries react to shootdowns of CAF Aircrew in your AOR
Ÿ Per doctrine what assets do/did they have to deploy?
Ÿ Does/did the adversary follow doctrine? How close to doctrine
Ÿ Does/did their doctrine vary with operations tempo or other major ongoing activities?
Ÿ What tactics do/did they have to counter CSAR efforts? Provide examples and references that may validate this assessment.
Ÿ If the adversary did deploy assets
â What priority would/did they give it in depending on operations tempo? If different please give rationale
â How fast would/did they react? Are there rules of thumb for calculating speed as a function of terrain, proximity to troop centers, other factors?
â Would/did they employ dedicated forces to foil rescue?
â Would/did they employ Air assets to support anti-CSAR missions? In what role?
â What type of MIJI would/did they employ (243 beacons, linguists, scanners, etc)
â How would/did they set-up forces (geometry) to counter CSAR?
â What is/was their shot doctrine (capture, kill first target, kill HAVA target, SAR TRAP)?
â What are/were the key elements of successful SAR TRAPS? (Success being beating US Forces)?
Return to the HH-60G Division Page